In business, a crisis lurking right around the corner could hit without warning at any time. Because such events are, by definition, unexpected—often impossible to imagine, much less predict—leaders need to develop solid strategies for quickly responding to any crisis that might arise to ensure that their businesses can survive and continue to thrive. 

Crises can come in so many different forms that creating a comprehensive plan to deal with every issue you might encounter isn’t a viable option. Fortunately, smart leaders understand how to build a flexible crisis management strategy that can be adapted to meet the needs of swiftly evolving situations.

Here are a few steps you can take to design and implement an effective crisis management strategy for your company.

1. Learn Resilience And Accept Vulnerability

To overcome a crisis, leaders need to be agile and learn resilience. This includes making difficult decisions with limited information and being prepared to lead through the outcomes that arise based on these quick decisions. Gaining the confidence to lead your organization and team will be imperative. Embracing vulnerability is also essential, as you must recognize that not all decisions will lead to the desired outcome.

2. Practice A ‘What Would Happen If…’ Exercise

Preparation is key. When I was in a former airline role, our crisis management strategy was to not only document our plans, but also prepare for crisis or disaster by practicing a “what would happen if…” exercise. For a business, that may mean ensuring a pipeline for succession, acknowledging that, as important as process is, people matter even more. During a crisis, act quickly, reassure the team and do what is right, even if it’s not easy.

3. Change According To The Times And Your People

Business leaders need to acknowledge that crisis management affects everyone in the company. When developing a strategy, it is important to understand the times you are in and the people you serve. The strategy cannot be based on a situation that occurred 20 years ago because business personalities and the makeup of companies have changed, and so should the approach.

4. Form A Crisis Management Team

Form a crisis management team made up of stakeholders from various departments, product lines and locations. Include someone gifted in communications, an IT leader, someone representing your talent and someone close to your clients. Gather that group to brainstorm a list of potential crises you may face. Then, prioritize those to identify the most likely crises this group should plan for first.

5. Identify Your Key Risks

The primary step toward developing a solid crisis management strategy is determining where you are at risk. In today’s environment, the way we conduct business has introduced a far greater field of risk, but it’s also brought more options. If you know your key risks, you can create a solid strategy that will keep you in business and out of long-term recovery.

6. Prioritize A ‘Crisis Focus’ With The Team

Meet with your team to create a “crisis focus.” Leaders typically juggle too much, and a crisis sucks up attention and resources. This causes balls to drop. Decide what your priority needs to be throughout the crisis. Keep it in line with your long-term vision and values. Identify what balls you will drop or set down and how. Clarify the steps needed to accomplish your priority objectives.

7. Forget Traditional Hierarchical Barriers

Rip up the organizational chart and remove traditional hierarchical barriers. Pull in the leaders with the knowledge, experience and passion for the work that needs to be done, regardless of their titles or roles. Then, create a flexible strategy that empowers everyone to do what needs to be done to address the crisis.

8. Outsource The Development Of A Framework

Outsource the creation of a crisis management framework to experts in the field. This is not your company’s core competency. Invest in a framework and a plan, and then get your organization’s input. Your teams can provide more detail, identify more potential crises, and help ensure that the plan will meet all stakeholders’ needs. Finally, task an internal team with rolling the plan out to all levels of personnel in the company. Be sure to update the plan annually.

9. Plan On Adjusting To Many Unknowns 

A solid crisis management plan needs to cover many dimensions. Ensure that you are evaluating critical infrastructure needs, process impacts and people impacts. Recognize that you cannot plan for everything. A good plan includes monitoring how the crisis itself shifts, and then replanning as details are uncovered. It’s not just about the actions you’ll take, but also how you plan to adjust to myriad unknowns.

10. Document Processes And Do Drills

Asking tough questions to see what is on the other side of the mountain is essential. Ask yourself about every possible pitfall, problem and detour that can (and will) happen, and then plan for them. Document workflows and processes, role play and do spontaneous drills involving a variety of team members who will take on different lead roles in the crisis to boost their problem-solving momentum and critical thinking.

11. Work Backward On A Plan To Fail

Define everything you need to fail. Then, determine with your people what’s needed to avoid those things that would lead you to fail and work backward. Then, move forward into actions to avoid failure. Watch how your people’s creativity helps your efforts soar to success. Then, watch how your team comes together as a result!

12. Share A Communication Plan With All Teams

Creating a solid communication plan that clearly identifies the team members involved and their roles is one of the most important steps to take in crisis management. This plan should be integrated into an overall contingency plan, and it should be shared with all team members. The desired outcome happens so much faster when you focus on finding effective solutions.

13. Take Responsibility For Any Crisis

Take responsibility for any crisis that is happening, could happen or might happen. Procrastination and neglect will be costly. Developing a crisis management strategy involves research to inform preparations, leadership and team building to ensure responsiveness and resiliency, and systems and processes to implement the strategy and maximize talents.

14. Stress-Test Your Strategy Regularly

A solid crisis management strategy should be stress-tested at least once a year. Have organizational leaders and/or a crisis team review the strategy by conducting a “fire drill” to spot any gaps in the plan. Also, ensure that all new employees, managers and leaders are trained on the key components of the crisis management plan you put in place. They should understand what their roles will be in the case of a business disruption.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post Crisis Management Strategies appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

For years, investors have turned to both gold and silver because it may provide a hedge in a potential economic or market downturn, as well as during sustained periods of rising inflation. Understanding the different uses of the two metals, their economic sensitivities and technical characteristics can help you determine which metal may benefit your portfolio.

Here are four factors to consider when deciding to invest in gold or silver:

Silver May Be More Tied to the Global Economy

More than half of all silver’s  demand comes from heavy industry and high technology, including smartphones, tablets, automobile electrical systems, solar-panel cells and many other products and applications, according to the World Silver Survey. As a result, silver tends to be more responsive to economic changes compared to gold. When economies take off, demand tends to grow for silver.

Silver Is More Volatile than Gold

The volatility in silver prices can be two to three times greater than that of gold on a given day. While some traders see this as an opportunity, such volatility can be challenging when managing portfolio risk.

Gold Has Been a More Powerful Diversifier than Silver

While silver may diversify your portfolio with moderately weak positive correlation to stocks, bonds and commodities, gold is considered a more powerful diversifier. The yellow metal has been consistently uncorrelated to stocks and has had very low correlations with other major asset classes—and with good reason: Unlike silver and industrial base metals, gold is less affected by economic declines because it has fewer industrial uses. 

Silver Currently Trades at a Lower Price than Gold

Per ounce,silver tends to be less expensive than gold, which recently hit record highs, making silver more accessible to small retail investors who wish to own the precious metals as physical assets. Gains in silver value tend to lag those of gold.

How You Can Invest in Gold and Silver

One of the attractions of these precious metals is that there are many ways to invest in them:

Physical Metals: Unlike stocks and bonds, you can purchase gold and silver as physical assets, as either bars and coins held as part of a Morgan Stanley brokerage account or as American Eagle coins held in a retirement account. The metals would be held by a third-party depository, not Morgan Stanley, though investors can take physical delivery if they want to store it themselves.

Holding bars and coins can have downside, though. For one, investors often pay a premium over the metal spot price on gold and silver coins because of manufacturing and distribution markups. You should also consider storage and even insurance costs. 

Exchange-Traded Funds: ETFs have become a popular way for investors to gain exposure to gold and silver, without the responsibility of storing a physical asset. You can buy shares and keep them in a traditional brokerage account. The fund’s operator is responsible for handling the costs of holding a physical supply of gold or silver and charging an expense ratio. But investing in an ETF doesn’t give investors access to the underlying metals. Also, some precious-metal ETFs are taxed as collectibles and don’t benefit from lower long-term capital gains rates.

Mining Stocks and Funds: Some investors see opportunity in owning shares of companies that mine for gold and silver, or mutual funds that hold portfolios of these miners.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post Gold and Silver Investing appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

1. The Military Will Prep for an Arctic Incursion

Canada’s military is finally treating the Arctic like the wild frontier it is: strategically positioned, resource-rich and increasingly crowded. China is coveting the North’s vast deposits of copper, nickel, lithium and cobalt, while melting sea ice is opening new shipping lanes through the Northwest Passage, giving Chinese submarines and research vessels (a.k.a. spy ships) new routes through Canadian waters. (Russia, too, is known to deploy “ghost” ships to snoop.) Canada is gearing up with new helicopters, rapid-response navy capabilities and a joint project with Australia to build a next-gen Arctic radar system.

2. While Carney Will Invest Billions in Defense

If the last year has taught us anything, it’s that our relationship with our southern neighbor is nowhere near as friendly as we thought it was. Our false sense of security has put us way behind on our NATO-prescribed military spending. In June, Mark Carney, alongside all other NATO nations, pledged to devote at least five per cent of the national GDP to defense by 2035—and his first federal budget is a strong start, boosting military spending by $84 billion over five years, the largest line item outside of infrastructure and productivity investments. On the shopping list: new armored vehicles, drone-tech improvements and cyber defense infrastructure, along with funds for recruiting personnel and expanding Canada’s defense industry.

3. Nation-Building Will Commence

First up in Carney’s sovereignty project is a massive effort to create new infrastructure and diversify trade. Created under the Building Canada Act, the Major Projects Office will cut red tape, align regulators and coordinate some $116 billion worth of investment. In September, it announced its first slate of priority projects: doubling LNG production in Kitimat, B.C., building a small modular nuclear reactor in Darlington, Ontario, expanding Montreal’s container terminal in Contrecœur, and boosting copper output at McIlvenna Bay in Saskatchewan and Red Chris in B.C. Two months later, it added more mining, LNG and hydro projects to the mix.

4. Political Deepfakes Will Hit Your Feed

In the past year, AI-powered deepfake videos have erroneously depicted Mark Carney sharing investment tips and Justin Trudeau having affairs with members of his cabinet, all with chilling realism. Manitoba has already moved to legislate against them: its new election-misinformation bill would ban the use of altered audio or video designed to influence voters, with penalties of up to $20,000 per day for non-compliance. Beyond that, analysts warn Canada’s patchwork response is too slow, and that without a coordinated national strategy, future elections could be flooded with lies.

5. Alberta Will Ponder Secession

Last year, renegade Alberta Premier Danielle Smith lowered the threshold of signatures required to trigger a referendum on secession from 20 per cent of registered voters down to 10 per cent; around the same time, polls showed that 36 per cent of Albertans supported separation. A group called the Alberta Prosperity Project has hungrily taken up the Wexit cause, while a rival organization called Forever Canadian has already collected more than 450,000 signatures in favor of staying put.

6. The Notwithstanding Clause Will Get Its Day in Court

Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms—a.k.a. the notwithstanding clause—has become a golden ticket for Canadian premiers, who have the power to invoke it whenever they want to pass laws that infringe on Charter rights. In 2026, the Supreme Court will hear two appeals protesting its use: one against the government of Saskatchewan, which is trying to ban students from changing pronouns without parental consent, and one against Quebec, which is seeking to bar public servants from wearing religious symbols. Both cases will test where Charter rights end and provincial powers begin.

7. Alberta Will Put Citizenship on Display

Starting in late 2026, Alberta will become the first Canadian province to add citizenship markers to driver’s licenses and provincial ID cards—a move Premier Danielle Smith bills as a win for convenience and security. Albertans, she argues, won’t need to juggle passports or paperwork to prove they’re Canadian, and the province says the change will streamline services and cut red tape. But tucked inside the policy is a political edge: Smith says the new marker will help safeguard elections by making it easier to verify who is eligible to vote. Critics warn it could create a visible divide between citizens and non-citizens and turn everyday identification into a proxy for immigration status.

8. Japan Will Become Our Next Big Trading Partner

Japan has almost completely cut off Russian oil and coal imports, and it’s eyeing Canada as a reliable, democratic replacement. It also wants more Canadian LNG—Mitsubishi already owns 15 per cent of LNG Canada, which began shipping to Asia in June—and is hungry for critical minerals to feed its EV battery factories. Hitachi, meanwhile, is helping Canada build its first small modular reactor. As Carney pushes to reduce Canada’s dependence on the U.S., a Pacific partnership suddenly seems inevitable.

9. The Feds Will Try to Clear the Immigration Backlog

The government may have slashed its immigration targets, but the pipeline is as full as ever: there are currently 2.2 million applications and more than 900,000 overdue. To speed things up, the feds are leaning on tech that lets officers rifle through up to a thousand cases at once, though they insist humans still make the final call. The result? Refusal letters that read like they were spat out by a bot. Lawyers have reported cases being denied due to missing documents that were in fact submitted, as well as financially secure applicants being rejected for supposedly having insufficient funds. In response, applicants will be clogging the federal court system with challenges.

10. Carney and Ford Will Face Off

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has made his name as an outspoken Trump critic, blasting his tariffs as “unjustified, unfair and frankly illegal,” threatening to cut electricity exports and calling out what he sees as trade bullying. Meanwhile, the PM is focused on calm diplomacy: quietly negotiating border agreements, coordinating with provinces on energy security and smoothing tensions over North American supply chains. Ford’s high‑octane public rebukes risk undermining Carney’s careful back-channel maneuvers. Expect fireworks as Canada balances principle and pragmatism, with each approach appealing to different voters. As for which one works better on Trump? We’re still not sure.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post Canada 2026 Predictions appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

If you’re interested in aging and longevity innovations, you may have heard of NMN, which stands for nicotinamide mononucleotide.

It’s a molecule your body makes naturally, but some people also take it as a supplement. Researchers are currently investigating its promising potential benefits for many different areas of health, including longevity, heart health, and exercise training.

Research on the effects of NMN supplements is still emerging, and more investigation is needed. Learn what we know so far about its potential benefits, optimal dosage, side effects, and safety.

What is nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN)?

Put simply, NMN is a naturally occurring molecule that helps power your body.

NMN is a type of molecule called a nucleotide. Nucleotides play many roles in your body, including as the building blocks of DNA.

Within your cells, NMN is converted into another molecule known as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). Your body needs NAD for a variety of functions involved in metabolism and energy production.

You might think of NMN as raw material and NAD as the refined version that your body can actually use.

The amount of NAD your body can make depends on the amount of NMN available in your body.

What does NMN do in the body?

All the cells in your body use NAD and therefore require NMN, its precursor, to function properly. NAD helps cells regulate a number of essential functions that help keep your cells running smoothly, including:

• energy metabolism
• DNA repair
• gene expression
• cellular stress responses

It’s essential that your cells have plenty of NMN to produce enough NAD to support these functions.

Your NMN levels naturally decline over time, and, as a result, your levels of NAD decline, too. This may contribute to some of the health effects you might experience during aging.

For example, research has shown that people with different age-related conditions, including diabetes and liver diseases, may have lower levels of NMN and NAD.

Potential benefits of NAD

Since taking NMN may help your body produce more NAD, it’s also important to consider the research behind the benefits of NAD. Studies investigating NAD shed light on its potential benefits:

• It may increase longevity. In your cells, NAD activates a group of proteins called sirtuins, which help repair your DNA. The activity of sirtuins is linked to longevity. On the flip side, low-NAD levels are associated with age-related diseases.
• It may have protective effects on the brain. NAD is thought to regulate the production of a protein that helps guard cells against oxidative stress. These cellular stressors are related to some neurological diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease.
• It may protect against cancer. Elevated NAD levels may help protect cells against oxidative stress and DNA damage, which are associated with cancer development.
• It may help with jet lag. Research suggests NAD may help adjust your internal clock, potentially helping ease jet lag or other circadian rhythm disorders.

It’s important to note that these benefits were found for NAD, not for NMN specifically. More research on the benefits of NMN and NAD is needed.

Recent research has found that taking NAD as a supplement doesn’t lead to the same potential benefits — but taking NMN can.

“The real breakthrough that occurred recently is our understanding of how to get NAD levels closer to those of our youth,” says Professor Andrew Salzman, MD, a Harvard Medical School alumni and a prominent drug inventor who’s leading NAD and NMN research at Wonderfeel.

“We now know that it can’t be done by delivering NAD either orally or by IV — because NAD has no mechanism for entering the cell.

“However, it can be done by providing the starting material for NAD, which is NMN. Cells have evolved a receptor for NMN — it’s a special protein on the surface of the cell which attaches to NMN and shuttles it into the cell. Once inside, NMN is converted by cellular enzymes to create NAD.”

What are the benefits of taking an NMN supplement?

Given the benefits of NMN on human health, some experts believe that taking an NMN supplement can help reverse the effects of aging. Some even claim that NMN is a proverbial “fountain of youth,” at least as shown in animal models.

Here we take a closer look at the human research on NMN supplementation, including potential benefits, safety risks, and available data on the most effective dosage.

Does NMN supplementation work?

Studies in animal models, especially mice, suggest that NMN supplements can provide various benefits, including reversing aging and improving cognitive health.

But does NMN supplementation actually work in humans?

That’s a hard question to answer at this point. Research on the effects of NMN supplementation in people is relatively new, and very few clinical trials (the gold standard for demonstrating a clinical benefit) have been published.

One study looked at the effects of taking 250 milligrams (mg) of NMN per day for 10 weeks in postmenopausal people with prediabetes and overweight or obesity. Those who took NMN had increased insulin sensitivity and signaling.

Note that two of the authors involved in this study are listed as inventors on patents involving the use of NMN.

Another recent study examined the effects of NMN on sleep quality in Japanese adults 65 years old or older. Participants received either 250 mg of NMN or a placebo control for 12 weeks.

Although taking NMN supplements did not appear to improve sleep quality, the researchers did see improvements in overall drowsiness and muscle responsiveness in the people who received NMN in the afternoon compared with the placebo group or those who took it in the morning.

Can it help with aging?

NMN and NAD levels naturally decline with age, so many researchers have suggested that taking NMN supplements may help with age-related health concerns.

A study in 10 Japanese men found that taking NMN (100, 250, or 500 mg) increased levels of NMN byproducts in the blood, including NAD.

Insulin resistance can develop with age and is one of the reasons diabetes is more common in older adults. Although studies haven’t specifically looked at the effects of taking NMN supplements, the research available suggests that it may help you maintain or regain insulin sensitivity with age.

More studies on these effects in humans are needed to investigate this potential benefit.

How can I increase my NMN naturally?

NMN is found naturally in a variety of foods, but. Some NMN-rich dietary sources include:

• avocados — 0.36 to 1.60 mg per 100 grams
• broccoli — 0.25 to 1.12 mg per 100 grams
• cabbage — up to 0.9 mg per 100 grams
• tomatoes — 0.26 to 0.30 mg per 100 grams
• raw beef — 0.06 to 0.42 mg per 100 grams

Small amounts of NMN are also found in cow’s milk, cucumbers, and edamame.

Is NMN safe, and does it have side effects?

NMN is an ideal supplement to increase cellular levels of NAD because it’s well-tolerated, and both human and animal studies have observed it had minimal side effects.

Research in humans has shown that doses of up to 1,200 mg daily are safe to consume.

Before adding any supplements to your diet, it’s important to talk with a healthcare professional about your unique situation and the potential risks and benefits you should consider.

What dosage of NMN should I take?

Given the limited data available on taking NMN supplements, it’s difficult to determine the ideal dose. Studies have found health benefits with doses as low as 250 mg of NMN per day, up to a maximum of 900 mg daily.

Only three studies, including those described above, have looked at the effects of taking NMN supplements over multiple doses. Importantly, safety does not appear to differ across different doses of NMN used.

In a study involving amateur runners, the aerobic benefits of NMN supplementation were greater with higher doses of NMN (1,200 mg) compared with lower doses (300 mg). But there was no difference observed in the benefits observed at a high dose compared with a medium dose (600 mg).

Takeaway

Many people, including experts, suggest that taking NMN supplements may provide a variety of health benefits. While animal studies have found the supplement reversed many age-related health effects, the evidence in humans is still limited.

Early studies suggest taking NMN supplements at doses of up to 1,200 mg per day may provide health benefits related to insulin sensitivity, aerobic function, and fatigue, with minimal risk of undesirable side effects.

Before adding any supplements to your diet, it’s important to talk with a healthcare professional about your unique situation and the potential risks and benefits you should consider.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post The Benefits of NMN appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

In the spirit of Halloween we are asking the question, are ghosts real? For centuries people from every corner of the world have answered that question with stories, rituals, and sometimes fear. Today we’ll look at what different cultures say, what science explains, and why belief in spirits remains so widespread.

In Japan, ghost stories center on the yūrei — spirits of the dead who return when funeral rites are incomplete or when they have unfinished business. Yūrei appear in classical theatre and art as pale, long-haired figures dressed in white, and occupy a clear place in Japanese rituals like Obon.

In Latin America one of the most famous spirits is La Llorona, the weeping woman who mourns the children she lost and is said to haunt rivers and canals — a tale used across generations to scare children away from danger and to explain tragic loss. This legend has countless local versions across Mexico and the Hispanic world.

Across much of the Muslim world the idea of invisible beings called jinn has long explained misfortune, possession, and strange phenomena — creatures mentioned in scripture and folklore that can be benevolent or dangerous, depending on tradition. For many believers, encounters with jinn are the culturally appropriate way to describe ghost-like experiences.

Science doesn’t find evidence for spirits that survive death, but it does offer explanations for many ghost experiences. One of the most well documented is sleep paralysis — a temporary state between sleep and wakefulness where the body stays immobile while the mind is conscious, often producing vivid, terrifying hallucinations of intruders, pressure on the chest, or figures in the room. Cross-cultural studies show these episodes are often interpreted as ghosts, demons, or jinn depending on local beliefs.

Other explanations include illusions caused by low-frequency electromagnetic fields, carbon monoxide poisoning, or the brain’s pattern-matching trying to make sense of vague stimuli — all of which can create the sense of a presence without any supernatural agent.

Belief in ghosts also fulfills social and psychological roles. Ghost stories comfort by giving meaning to loss, enforce cultural norms, and create collective cautionary tales. In times of stress, grief, or uncertainty people are more likely to interpret ambiguous events as supernatural. Surveys show belief is common: around four in ten adults in some countries say they believe in ghosts, and belief levels vary widely by nation and culture.

History shows organized movements around ghosts too — Victorian spiritualism, for example, turned séance-going and mediumship into a social phenomenon in the 19th century, blending grief, science, and entertainment.

Across the globe there are famous haunted places and repeatable reports: unexplained sounds in old houses, cold spots, and objects that seem to move. Investigators sometimes document odd audio, video artifacts, or electromagnetic spikes — but these findings rarely stand up to controlled testing. In contrast, many haunting claims are later linked to environmental causes, pranksters, or psychological suggestion. Sleep-paralysis and mass social priming can also turn a rumor into a local ‘epidemic’ of sightings.

So, are ghosts real? The short answer: not in the scientific sense as disembodied minds proven to persist after death — but ghost experiences are very real to the people who have them. Culture, brain states, environment, and social meaning all shape how we interpret those experiences. Whether you call them spirits, jinn, yūrei, or hallucinations, they tell us something powerful about how humans process loss, danger, and mystery.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post Are Ghosts Real? appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of speech—the right to express opinions without government restraint—is a democratic ideal that dates back to ancient Greece. In the United States, the First Amendment guarantees free speech, though the United States, like all modern democracies, places limits on this freedom. In a series of landmark cases, the U.S. Supreme Court over the years has helped to define what types of speech are—and aren’t—protected under U.S. law.

The ancient Greeks pioneered freedom of expression as a democratic principle. The ancient Greek word “parrhesia” means “free speech,” or “to speak candidly.” The term first appeared in Greek literature around the end of the fifth century B.C.

During the classical period, parrhesia became a fundamental part of the democracy of Athens. Leaders, philosophers, playwrights and everyday Athenians were free to openly discuss politics and religion and to criticize the government in some settings.

First Amendment

In the United States, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech.

The First Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights—the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. The Bill of Rights provides constitutional protection for certain individual liberties, including freedoms of speech, assembly and worship.

The First Amendment doesn’t specify what exactly is meant by freedom of speech. Defining what types of speech should and shouldn’t be protected by law has fallen largely to the courts.

In general, the First Amendment guarantees the right to express ideas and information. On a basic level, it means that people can express an opinion (even an unpopular or unsavory one) without fear of government censorship.

It protects all forms of communication, from speeches to art and other media.

Flag Burning

While freedom of speech pertains mostly to the spoken or written word, it also protects some forms of symbolic speech. Symbolic speech is an action that expresses an idea.

Flag burning is an example of symbolic speech that is protected under the First Amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson, a youth communist, burned a flag during the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas to protest the Reagan administration.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1990, reversed a Texas court’s conviction that Johnson broke the law by desecrating the flag. Texas v. Johnson invalidated statutes in Texas and 47 other states prohibiting flag burning.

When Isn’t Speech Protected?

Not all speech is protected under the First Amendment.

Forms of speech that aren’t protected include:

• Obscene material such as child pornography
• Plagiarism of copyrighted material
• Defamation (libel and slander)
• True threats

Speech inciting illegal actions or soliciting others to commit crimes aren’t protected under the First Amendment, either.

The Supreme Court decided a series of cases in 1919 that helped to define the limitations of free speech. Congress passed the Espionage Act of 1917, shortly after the United States entered into World War I. The law prohibited interference in military operations or recruitment.

Socialist Party activist Charles Schenck was arrested under the Espionage Act after he distributed fliers urging young men to dodge the draft. The Supreme Court upheld his conviction by creating the “clear and present danger” standard, explaining when the government is allowed to limit free speech. In this case, they viewed draft resistant as dangerous to national security.

American labor leader and Socialist Party activist Eugene Debs also was arrested under the Espionage Act after giving a speech in 1918 encouraging others not to join the military. Debs argued that he was exercising his right to free speech and that the Espionage Act of 1917 was unconstitutional. In Debs v. United States the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Espionage Act.

Freedom of Expression

The Supreme Court has interpreted artistic freedom broadly as a form of free speech.

In most cases, freedom of expression may be restricted only if it will cause direct and imminent harm. Shouting “fire!” in a crowded theater and causing a stampede would be an example of direct and imminent harm.

In deciding cases involving artistic freedom of expression the Supreme Court leans on a principle called “content neutrality.” Content neutrality means the government can’t censor or restrict expression just because some segment of the population finds the content offensive.

Free Speech in Schools

In 1965, students at a public high school in Des Moines, Iowa, organized a silent protest against the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands to protest the fighting. The students were suspended from school. The principal argued that the armbands were a distraction and could possibly lead to danger for the students.

The Supreme Court didn’t bite—they ruled in favor of the students’ right to wear the armbands as a form of free speech in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District. The case set the standard for free speech in schools. However, First Amendment rights typically don’t apply in private schools.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post Freedom of Speech appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

The country of Venezuela, officially known as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, is located on the northern coast of the South American continent.  Its territory encompasses roughly 354,000 square miles (916,445 square kilometers), on which lives the country’s estimated population of 29.1 million inhabitants.  From a natural perspective, Venezuela is considered a state with extremely high biodiversity, with habitats ranging from the Andes Mountains in the west to the Amazon Basin rainforest in the south, via extensive llanos plains and Caribbean coastline in the center and the Orinoco River Delta in the east.

Venezuela is organized as a federal presidential republic consisting of 23 states, the Capital District (covering the capital city of Caracas), and Federal Dependencies (covering Venezuela’s offshore islands). Venezuela also claims all Guyanese territory west of the Essequibo River, a 61,583 square mile tract dubbed Guayana Esequiba or the Zona en Reclamación (the “zone being reclaimed”).

Among Latin American countries, Venezuela is considered one of the most highly urbanized, as the vast majority of Venezuelans live in the cities of the north, especially in the capital, Caracas, which is also the largest city in Venezuela.  Since the discovery of oil in the early 20th century, Venezuela has been one of the world’s leading exporters of oil and has the largest oil reserves in South America. Previously an underdeveloped exporter of agricultural commodities such as coffee and cocoa, oil quickly came to dominate exports and government revenues. The 1980s oil glut led to an external debt crisis and a long-running economic crisis, which saw inflation peak at 100% in 1996 and poverty rates rise to 66% in 1995.  By 1998, the country’s per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) fell to the same level as 1963, down a third from its 1978 peak.

The fortunate recovery of oil prices after 2001 boosted the Venezuelan economy and facilitated social spending, which significantly reduced inequality and poverty, although the fallout of the 2008 global financial crisis saw a renewed economic downturn. In February 2013, Venezuela devalued its currency due to the rising shortages in the country. Shortages of items included toilet paper, milk, flour and other necessities. As of November 2013, Venezuela’s inflation had increased to 54%. This was one of the main causes of the 2014 Venezuelan protests.

History of Venezuela: Introduction

Venezuela boasts a long and storied history.  In 1522, the country was colonized by the Spanish amid resistance from the region’s indigenous people.  In 1811, the country became one of the first Spanish-American colonies to declare independence, which was not securely established until 1821, when Venezuela was included as a department of the federal republic of Gran Colombia.

Venezuela achieved full independence as a separate country in 1830.  Throughout the 19th century Venezuela suffered political turmoil and dictatorship, remaining dominated by regional caudillos (military strongmen) until the mid-20th century.

Since 1958, the country has had a series of democratic governments. Economic shocks in the 1980s and 1990s led to several political crises, including the deadly Caracazo riots of 1989, two attempted coups in 1992, and the impeachment of President Carlos Andrés Pérez for embezzlement of public funds in 1993. A collapse in confidence in the existing parties saw the 1998 election of former career officer Hugo Chávez and the launch of the Bolivarian Revolution, beginning with a 1999 Constituent Assembly to write a new Constitution of Venezuela.

Pre-History of Venezuela

Historians postulate that the first inhabitants of the Americas came from Siberia across the Bering Strait, spread over the North American continent, then moved down to Central and South America in several waves of migration. There is evidence of human habitation in what is now northwest Venezuela going back more than 15,000 years. Steady agriculture was established around the 1st millennium, leading to the first year-round settlements in the region.

Groups which were formerly nomadic began to develop into larger cultures in Venezuela, cultures that belonged to three main linguistic families: Carib, Arawak and Chibcha. By the time of the Spanish conquest at the end of the 15th century, some 300,000 to 400,000 indigenous people inhabited the region that is now Venezuela.

The warlike Carib tribes occupied the central and eastern coast of the country during this time, living off fishing and shifting agriculture. Various Arawak groups were scattered over the western plains and north up to the coast. They lived off hunting and food-gathering, and occasionally practiced farming.

The Timote-Cuica tribes, of the Chibcha linguistic family, were the most advanced of Venezuela’s pre-Hispanic societies. They lived in the Andes and developed advanced agricultural techniques, including irrigation and terracing. They were also skilled craftspeople, as we can judge by the artifacts they left behind: examples of their fine pottery are shown in museums across the country. No major architectural works have survived from the pre-colonial era, although there are some smaller sites in the Andean region that have recently been unearthed and will be opening for tourism in the next few years.

Colonial History of Venezuela

In the year 1498, on his third trip to the New World, Christopher Columbus became the first European to set foot on Venezuelan soil. Columbus anchored at the eastern tip of the Península de Paria, just opposite what is now the city of Trinidad.  He originally believed that he was on another island, but the voluminous mouth of the Río Orinoco hinted that he had stumbled onto something slightly larger.

A year after Columbus’ discovery, the Spanish explorer Alonso de Ojeda, accompanied by the Italian explorer Amerigo Vespucci, sailed up to the Península de la Guajira, at the western end of present-day Venezuela.  Upon entering Lago de Maracaibo, the Spaniards saw the local indigenous people living in palafitos (thatched huts on stilts above the water). They called the land “Venezuela,” literally “Little Venice,” perhaps as a sarcastic sailor joke, as these rustic reed dwellings didn’t exactly match the opulent palaces of the Italian city they knew. The name of Venezuela appeared for the first time on a map in 1500 and has remained to this day. Laguna de Sinamaica is reputedly the place where the first Spanish sailors saw the palafitos, and you can see similar huts there today.

Alonso de Ojeda sailed further west along the coast and briefly explored parts of what is now the country of Colombia. He saw local aborigines wearing gold adornments and was astonished by their wealth. Their stories about fabulous treasures inland gave birth to the myth of El Dorado (The Golden One), a mysterious land abundant in gold. Attracted by these supposed riches, the shores of Venezuela and Colombia became the target of a number of Spanish expeditions, an obsession with El Dorado driving them into the interior. Their search resulted in the rapid colonization of the land, though El Dorado was naturally never found.

The Spanish established their first settlement on Venezuelan soil around 1500, at Nueva Cádiz, on the small island of Cubagua, just south of Isla de Margarita. Pearl harvesting provided a livelihood for the settlers, and the town developed into a busy port until an earthquake and tidal wave destroyed it in 1541. The earliest Venezuelan town that is still in existence, Cumaná, on the northeast coast, dates back to 1521 and is an enjoyable place to visit, even though earthquakes ruined much of the early Spanish colonial architecture.

From an official standpoint, most of Venezuela was ruled by Spain from Santo Domingo (present-day capital of the Dominican Republic) until 1717, when it fell under the administration of the newly created viceroyalty of Nueva Granada, with its capital in Bogotá, Colombia.

The colony’s population of indigenous communities and Spanish invaders diversified with the arrival of black slaves, brought from Africa to serve as the workforce in a number of agricultural pursuits. Most of them were set to work on plantations on the Caribbean coast. By the 18th century, Africans had surpassed the indigenous population in terms of number.

Independence: History of Venezuela in the Early 19 Century

With but a few exploited gold mines, Venezuela lurked in the shadows of the Spanish Empire for its first three centuries. However, the country took a more prominent role at the beginning of the 19th century, when Venezuela gave Latin America one of its greatest heroes: a man named Simón Bolívar.

Venezuela longed to be out from under the thumb of the Spanish Empire, and in 1806 a revolutionary by the name of Francisco de Miranda lit the initial flame for that cause. However, his efforts to set up an independent administration in Caracas ended when fellow conspirators handed him over to the Spanish. He was shipped to Spain and died in jail. Bolívar then assumed leadership of the revolution. After unsuccessful initial attempts to defeat the Spaniards at home, he withdrew to Colombia, then to Jamaica, until the opportune moment came in 1817.

The Napoleonic Wars had just ended in Europe, and Bolívar’s agent in London was able to raise money and arms, and recruit a small number of British Legion veterans of the Peninsular War. With this force and an army of horsemen from Los Llanos, Bolívar marched over the Andes and defeated the Spanish at the Battle of Boyacá, bringing independence to Colombia in August of 1819. Four months later in Angostura (present-day Ciudad Bolívar), the Angostura Congress proclaimed Gran Colombia (Great Colombia), a new state unifying what are now the sovereign countries of Colombia, Venezuela and Ecuador (though the last two were still under Spanish rule). The memories of the event are still alive in Ciudad Bolívar, and you can see the great mansion where the first congress debated. Venezuela’s liberation came on June 24, 1821 at Carabobo, where Bolívar’s troops defeated the Spanish royalist army.

Although Venezuela was seen as the least important of Gran Colombia’s three provinces, the country bore the brunt of the fighting. Venezuelan patriots fought not only on their own territory, but also in the armies that Bolívar led into Colombia and down the Pacific Coast. By the end of 1824, Bolívar and his assistants had liberated Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia. It’s estimated that a quarter of the Venezuelan population died in the independence wars.

Gran Colombia and the History of Venezuela in the Late 19 Century

Bolívar’s vision of a unified republic fell apart even before he died in 1830. On his deathbed, he proclaimed: “America is ungovernable. The man who serves a revolution plows the sea. This nation will fall inevitably into the hands of the unruly mob and then will pass into the hands of almost indistinguishable petty tyrants.” Sadly, he was not far off the mark with those statements. The three-province state of Gran Colombia began to collapse from the moment of its birth; the central regime was incapable of governing the immense country with its racial and regional differences. The new state existed for only a decade before splitting into three separate countries.

Following Venezuela’s separation and departure from Gran Colombia, the Venezuelan congress approved a new constitution and—quite incredibly—banned Bolívar from his own homeland.  In fact, it took the Venezuelan nation 12 long years to finally acknowledge its debt to the man to whom it owed its very freedom. In 1842, Bolívar’s remains were brought from Santa Marta, Colombia, where he died, to Caracas and entombed in the national cathedral.  In 1876 they were solemnly transferred to the Panteón Nacional in Caracas, where they now rest in a bronze sarcophagus.

The year 1830, when Venezuela achieved its full independence as a separate country, marked the beginning of the era of “indistinguishable petty tyrants.” The post-independence period in Venezuela was marked by serious governmental problems that continued for more than a century. These were times of despotism and anarchy, with the country being ruled by a series of military dictators known as caudillos.

The first of the caudillos was General José Antonio Páez, who controlled the country for 18 long years (1830–48). It was a tough rule, but it established a certain political stability and put the weak economy on its feet. The period that followed was an almost uninterrupted chain of civil wars that was only stopped by another long-lived dictator, General Antonio Guzmán Blanco (1870–88). Blanco launched a broad program of reform, including a new constitution, and assured some temporary stability, but his despotic rule triggered wide, popular opposition, and when he stepped down the country plunged again into a bloody civil war.

During the 1840s, Venezuela raised the question of its eastern border with British Guiana (present-day Guyana); claiming for its own as much as two-thirds of Guiana, up to the Río Esequibo. The issue was a subject of lengthy diplomatic negotiations and was eventually settled in 1899 by an arbitration tribunal, which gave rights over the questioned territory to Great Britain. Despite the ruling, Venezuela maintains its claim to this day. All maps produced in Venezuela have this chunk of Guyana within Venezuela’s boundaries, labeled “Zona en Reclamación.”

Yet another conflict that led to serious international tension was Venezuela’s failure to meet payments to Great Britain, Italy and Germany on loans accumulated during the government of yet another caudillo, General Cipriano Castro (1899–1908). In response, the three European countries sent their navies to blockade Venezuelan seaports in 1902.

History of Venezuela in the 20 Century

The first half of the 20th century was dominated by five successive military rulers from the Andean state of Táchira. The longest lasting and most tyrannical of these was the General Juan Vicente Gómez, who seized power in 1908 and didn’t relinquish it until his death in 1935. During his ruthless reign, Gómez phased out the parliament, squelched the opposition and monopolized power.

The discovery of oil in the 1910s helped the Gómez regime put the national economy on its feet. By the late 1920s, Venezuela was the world’s largest exporter of oil, which not only contributed to economic recovery but also enabled the government to pay off the country’s entire foreign debt. As in most oil-rich-states, almost none of the oil wealth made its way to the common citizens. The overwhelming majority of Venezuelans continued to subsist in poverty with little or no educational or health facilities, let alone reasonable housing. Fast oil money also led to the neglect of agriculture and to the development of other types of production. It was easier to just import everything from abroad, which worked for a while, but proved to be unsustainable.

Tensions in Venezuela rose treacherously during the following dictatorships, exploding in 1945 when Rómulo Betancourt, leader of the left-wing Acción Democrática (AD) party, took control of the government. A new constitution was adopted in 1947, and the noted novelist Rómulo Gallegos became president in Venezuela’s first democratic election. The inevitable coup took place only eight months after Gallegos’ election, with Colonel Marcos Pérez Jiménez emerging as the leader. Once in control, he smashed the opposition and plowed oil money into public works and built up Caracas. He superficially modernized the country but the mushrooming development did not heal the country’s economic and social disparities, nor did it quell the bitter resentment that lingered from the coup.

Pérez Jiménez was overthrown in 1958 by an alliance of civilians and navy and air-force officers. The country returned to democratic rule and Rómulo Betancourt was elected president. He enjoyed popular support and actually completed the constitutional five-year term of office – the first democratically elected Venezuelan president to do so. Since then, all changes of president have been by constitutional means, although the last decade has seen a few hiccups.

During the prescribed term of President Rafael Caldera (1969–74), the steady stream of oil money flowed into the country’s coffers keeping the economy buoyant. President Carlos Andrés Pérez (1974–79) also benefited from the oil bonanza; not only did production of oil rise but, more importantly, the price quadrupled following the Arab-Israeli war in 1973. In 1975 Pérez nationalized the iron-ore and oil industries and went on a spending spree; imported luxury goods were in large supply in the country’s crammed shops and the nation got the impression that the mythical riches of El Dorado had finally materialized.

In the late 1970s, the growing international recession and oil glut began to shake Venezuela’s economy to the core. Oil revenues declined, heightening unemployment and inflation, and once more forcing the country into foreign debt. The 1988 drop in world oil prices cut the country’s revenue in half, casting doubt on Venezuela’s ability to pay off its debt. Austerity measures introduced in 1989 by Pérez Jiménez (elected for the second time) triggered a wave of protests, culminating in the loss of more than 300 lives in three days of bloody riots known as “El Caracazo.” Further austerity measures sparked protests that often escalated into riots. Strikes and street demonstrations continued to be part of everyday life in Venezuela.

To make matters even worse, there were two attempted coups d’état that occurred in Venezuela in 1992. The first, in February of that year, was led by paratrooper Colonel Hugo Chávez.  Shooting throughout Caracas claimed more than 20 lives, but the government retained control. Chávez was sentenced to long-term imprisonment. The second attempt, in November, was led by junior air-force officers. The air battle over Caracas, with war planes flying between skyscrapers, gave the coup a cinematic, if not apocalyptic, dimension. The Palacio de Miraflores, the presidential palace, was bombed and partially destroyed. The army was called to defend the president, and this time more than 100 people died.

Corruption, bank failures and loan defaults plagued the government through the mid-1990s. In 1995, Venezuela was forced to devalue the currency by more than 70%. By the end of 1998, two-thirds of Venezuela’s 23 million inhabitants were living below the poverty line. Drug-trafficking and crime had increased and Colombian guerrillas had dramatically expanded their operations into Venezuela’s frontier areas.

Hugo Chávez and the History of Venezuela in the 21 Century

When it comes to politics, there is perhaps nothing more noteworthy than a dramatic comeback, and that’s exactly what Venezuela witnessed toward the close of the 20 century.  The 1998 presidential election in Venezuela put Hugo Chávez, the leader of the 1992 failed coup, into the presidency.  After being pardoned in 1994, Chávez embarked on an aggressive populist campaign: comparing himself to Bolívar, promising help (and handouts) to the poorest masses and positioning himself in opposition to the US-influenced free-market economy. He vowed to produce a great, if vague, “peaceful and democratic social revolution.”

After his victory in the election, however, Chávez’ “social revolution” was anything but peaceful. Shortly after taking office, Chávez set about rewriting the constitution. The new document was approved in a referendum in December 1999, granting him new and sweeping powers. The introduction of a package of new decree laws in 2001 was met with angry protests, and was followed by a massive and violent strike in April 2002. It culminated in a coup d’état run by military leaders sponsored by a business lobby, in which Chávez was forced to resign. He regained power two days later, but this only intensified the conflict.

While the popular tensions rose, in December 2002 the opposition called a general strike in an effort to oust the president. The nationwide strike paralyzed the country, including its vital oil industry and a good part of the private sector. After 63 days, the opposition finally called off the strike, which had cost the country 7.6% of its GDP and further devastated the oil-based economy. Chávez again survived and claimed victory.

National politics continued to be shaky until Chávez won a 2004 referendum and consolidated his already sweeping power. Emboldened by greater political support and his pockets engorged by high oil prices, Chávez quickly moved to expand his influence beyond the borders of Venezuela, reaching out to other Leftist leaders in Bolivia, Argentina, Cuba, Uruguay, Chile and Brazil. He had openly allied himself with Cuba’s Castro regime, supported the successful Leftist candidacy of Bolivia’s Evo Morales and Leftist candidates in Peru and Mexico who did not win office.

In 2005, shortly after Caracas hosted the 6th World Social Forum, Chávez started a highly publicized and dubiously intentioned program to provide reduced-priced heating oil for impoverished people in the United States. The program was expanded in 2006 to include four of New York City’s five boroughs, providing 25 million gallons of fuel for low-income New Yorkers at 40% off the wholesale price. While the program obviously aided hundreds of thousands of poor New Yorkers, it was used as a political jab to Chávez’s then enemy, former U.S. President George W Bush.

The end of 2006 was enveloped in the lead-up to the December 3 presidential election. Chávez’ closest challenger, Manuel Rosales, accused the president of providing impractical political favors and aid to other countries while poverty and crime increased at home, and also challenged Chávez’ government-approved land takeovers (for redistribution to the landless) and the military build-up for a hypothetical U.S. invasion. Chávez wrote Rosales off as a lackey for the United States and refused to debate him on TV. Chávez won again with the Organization of American States and the Carter Center certifying the results.

Chávez came out of the Socialist closet during his second term, further increasing public works and social programs to benefit the poor (bringing basic healthcare to the barrios, for example) and nationalizing the country’s largest telecommunication, cement and steel companies, the majority of its electricity industry and many hotels, recreational and transport facilities. He has also managed to instill the idea of inclusion in politics among the general population whereas previous governments blatantly excluded all but the highest echelons of society.

Despite contributing to Venezuela’s deep oil pockets and an improved life for the poor, Chávez’s popularity started to wane. Infrastructure upgrades, such as improved roads and bridges, shiny new subways and barrio teleféricos (cable cars) kept up appearances, but the decade ended with Venezuela struggling to combat a very serious energy and water shortage, a crisis that has struck the heart of the middle and upper classes. Widespread blackouts were commonplace throughout the country and Chávez called on all Venezuelans to limit their showers to three minutes only (a “Communist shower,” he said).

As 2010 was ushered in, so was water rationing, with Caracas temporarily taking the brunt of the blow: Up to 48 hours per week without water. Chávez supporters balked at the idea, however, and rations were suspended in Caracas, amplifying the problem elsewhere and sparking protests in Mérida. Electricity Minister Ángel Rodríguez was removed from office over the debacle, but the cabinet shakeup didn’t stop there: In January alone, the Vice-President and Defense Minister, Ramón Carrizalez, and his wife, Environment Minister Yubirí Ortega; and the Minister for Public Banking, Eugenio Vásquez Orellana, all resigned. Rumors blamed the electricity crisis on a disagreement with government policy, though all three politicians denied this. A month later, the energy crisis deteriorated to the point that Chávez issued a state of emergency.

Chávez also instilled many controversial policies to combat the country’s wild inflation and debilitating economy, including price controls on basic foodstuffs, a move that, on one hand, allows families to purchase the same amount of basic food with the same amount of money despite inflation; but sparked occasional food shortages of basics like milk and sugar on the other.  In January of 2010, Chávez announced a sharp devaluation of the currency known as the bolívar fuerte—the first since 2005—thus creating a two-tier official exchange rate in Venezuela, a move designed to boost revenue from oil exports and limit unnecessary imports.  However, the people of Venezuela, fearing widespread price increases and astronomical inflation, mobbed imported electronics stores. Chávez condemned stores that raised their prices and acted: The Venezuelan Institute for the Defense of People in Their Access to Goods and Service shut down dozens of stores for price-gouging.

Elsewhere, strict currency controls meant that Venezuelans who travel abroad were only allowed a rationing of $2,500 in credit card and $500 cash per year to spend outside the country, leaving some feeling trapped within their own borders; and car showrooms were (and continue to be) virtually empty.

Although Brazil’s controversial approval of Venezuela’s entry into Mercosur was a major victory for Chávez and bilateral trade, Chávez’s foreign relationships weren’t faring much better than his domestic economy. Bi-national relations with Colombia remained extremely fragile over the neighboring country’s accusations that Venezuela was supplying arms to FARC rebels and its decision to allow US troops to operate out of seven of its military bases. Chávez banned Colombian car imports and built up troops at the border after several suspicious, cross-border deaths on both sides. Things got personal over these bi-national issues during a private meeting of heads-of-state at the Group of Rio summit in Cancun in February 2010, when Colombian President Álvaro Uribe scoffed at Chávez: “‘Be a man…you’re brave speaking at a distance, but a coward when it comes to talking face to face.” Chávez nearly stormed out.

Some popularity surveys, including one by the group known as Datanálisis, showed that Chávez’s approval rating in 2011 had fell to 46% – the first drop below 50% since 2004.  These numbers seemed to indicate that the controversial leader was running out of gas. 

Despite his waning popularity, Chávez, even after a publicized battle with colon cancer, declared his intentions to run for a fourth six-year term in the elections of 2012.  Chavez was indeed reelected in 2012, and while he did begin his fourth term on January 10, 2013, he eventually succumbed to his illness and died less than 2 months later on March 5, 2013.

Vice President, Nicolas Maduro, took over the presidential powers and duties for the remainder of Chávez’s abbreviated term until presidential elections were held. Today, Maduro continues to serve as the president of Venezuela.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post A Brief History of Venezuela appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

It is fun to look at a globe and wonder what it would be like to retire abroad. This might become a more common practice as one nears retirement age. After all, a small nest egg has the potential to go further and last longer in countries other than America. 

That’s why so many nearing retirement consider and study the subject, taking into account factors such as cost of living and other potential amenities (or lack thereof). Then there are those who actually dare to live the dream and walk that happy international plank. 

What might you expect from such a big move? So much depends on what you’re looking for. Many prefer a more tropical environment while other retirees put a stronger focus on an affordable healthcare system. Here are the top 7 countries to retire abroad in 2025.

Spain/Portugal

Portugal is a near-consensus first choice for many exploring this topic. Ex patriots note that Portugal is well known for its modest cost of living. The country also boasts a number of friendly tax policies with retired Americans in mind. Ex-pats also embrace the high-quality healthcare system that Portugal is known for. Combine these factors with an active lifestyle and the country’s breathtaking beach settings and it’s easy to see why Portugal is a big hit with Americans who retire abroad. 

So, what’s up with Portugal’s Iberian neighbor? What makes Spain one of the best countries to retire abroad? Like Portugal, Spain offers a Mediterranean climate that must be experienced to be believed. Spanish culture also values and genuinely respects its elders. Its citizens enjoy a vibrant lifestyle and excellent healthcare. Some retired Americans note that its “slower pace of life” might be a bit of a culture shock for those who are or were used to the hustle and bustle of state-side life but for most, that’s exactly the point of retirement. 

Switzerland

If you’re ok with trading in beautiful Mediterranean beaches for amazing mountain-side vistas, then Switzerland might be the choice for you. Why is Switzerland considered one of the best countries to retire abroad? 

Switzerland consistently ranks near the top of the list when it comes to quality of life. Breathing in all that fresh mountain air is likely one of the contributing factors to this ranking. However, one should also consider Switzerland’s robust healthcare system and its incredibly friendly culture. This is reflected in its low crime rate and politically stable government. Switzerland’s central location in Europe also makes it a great home base for travelling around the continent. 

Costa Rica

Let’s get tropical. Ex patriots love Costa Rica and for many obvious reasons. To start with, most associate Costa Rica with that of a lush, tropical paradise and they aren’t wrong. 

Costa Rica is very affordable and features a universal healthcare system. If you’re up for exploring key features and locations of Central America, you might also appreciate Costa Rica’s immediate proximity to Panama and Nicaragua. If an affordable, laid-back beachside paradise is what you’re looking for then Costa Rica should be high on your retirement checklist.

Panama

It’s no secret among ex-pats moving to Central America. Panama is renowned for its “retirement visa” which comes with a number of impressive benefits and discounts. The ease of entry into this tropical wonderland is a big selling point. 

Like its many beautiful neighbors, Panama also features a low cost of living and a thriving ex-pat community. Panama also celebrates a very low crime rate and is considered to be one of the safest countries in Central America. Yes, there can be language barriers but all you need to do is find other patches of relocated Americans and you will feel at home in no time. You can also try your hand at the native tongue. 

Mexico

While in the neighborhood, you might be pleased to note that our neighbor to the south also ranks well when Americans choose to retire abroad. To start with, its immediate proximity to home doesn’t hurt. While some might suggest that crime can be an issue in certain parts of the country, ex-pats often cite Mexico’s vibrant culture and affordable living conditions as ideal reasons for making the move. 

Mexico also puts a strong focus on helping retirees achieve permanent residency. Many retirees and ex-pats will tell you that when you retire abroad rotating or routinely expiring visas can be a slight hassle. Mexico is keenly aware of the issue and makes an effort to help and accept those who choose to seek a permanent home there.

Thailand

This tropical Asian paradise boasts a very low cost of living. Your retirement money will go a long way in Thailand. Also, if you are looking to escape cold winters and harsh rotating seasons, then you might be pleased to note that Thailand is loved for its often clear weather and year-long warm climate. 

As a result, Thailand boasts a strong ex-pat community. Other American retirees love the excellent healthcare system and the relaxed citizenry that embraces its diverse culture.

Malta

Returning to Europe, Malta is a gem for those who choose to retire abroad. If you’re looking for a quiet coastal lifestyle then get thee to Malta. The healthcare system in Malta is highly regarded and features both a public and private system. Ex-pats also love Malta for its low cost of living and 300 plus days of sun every year. As a result, the island boasts a large and growing ex-pat community which provides ample opportunities to network and socialize.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post 7 Best Countries to Retire appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

In the modern world, few inventions have had such a profound impact on global security, politics, and human history as the nuclear weapon. Since its first detonation during World War II, nuclear weapons have remained a subject of intense debate, fear, and fascination. They are symbols of the immense power and potential for destruction contained within the atom. Yet, their existence raises important questions about how nations interact, how power is measured, and how the future of humanity can be shaped in an era where nuclear warfare remains a real possibility.

At their core, nuclear weapons are devices designed to release an enormous amount of energy through nuclear reactions, either by splitting atoms (fission) or combining them (fusion). This energy is capable of destroying entire cities in a single flash, instantly vaporizing people, buildings, and infrastructure. But nuclear weapons are not just physical objects; they are symbols of geopolitics, deterrence, and the delicate balance of peace and war in the modern world.

The Science Behind Nuclear Weapons

To understand the immense power of nuclear weapons, one must first understand the science behind them. At the heart of a nuclear weapon is the concept of energy release through nuclear reactions. The two most commonly used reactions in nuclear weapons are nuclear fission and nuclear fusion.

Nuclear Fission: Splitting the Atom

Nuclear fission is the process that powers atomic bombs. In this reaction, the nucleus of a heavy atom, typically uranium-235 or plutonium-239, is split into two smaller nuclei, along with several neutrons and a significant amount of energy. This energy is released in the form of an explosive burst. When one atom undergoes fission, it releases neutrons that can trigger fission in nearby atoms, causing a chain reaction. If the material is in a sufficient quantity and properly arranged, this chain reaction becomes uncontrollable, leading to a massive release of energy.

The first atomic bombs, like those dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, used uranium-235 and plutonium-239 for fission. The precise arrangement and mass of these materials are critical to ensure the reaction is rapid and efficient, maximizing the explosion’s energy output.

Nuclear Fusion: Combining Atoms

Nuclear fusion, on the other hand, is the process that powers hydrogen bombs, which are significantly more powerful than fission bombs. In fusion, light atomic nuclei, typically isotopes of hydrogen like deuterium and tritium, combine to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a tremendous amount of energy in the process. This is the same reaction that powers the sun. Fusion bombs, also known as thermonuclear weapons, use a fission bomb as a trigger to provide the extremely high temperatures and pressures necessary for fusion to occur.

Fusion weapons are much more powerful than fission bombs and can produce explosions with yields many times greater than those of traditional atomic bombs. The scale of destruction from a thermonuclear bomb can wipe out entire regions, causing immense loss of life and environmental damage.

The History of Nuclear Weapons

The history of nuclear weapons is deeply intertwined with the 20th century’s major geopolitical events, particularly World War II and the Cold War. Understanding this history is crucial for comprehending how nuclear weapons became a central element of global military strategy and international relations.

The Manhattan Project: Birth of the Atomic Bomb

The journey towards the development of nuclear weapons began in the 1930s, when scientists first discovered that the atom could be split to release energy. In 1938, German scientists Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann made the groundbreaking discovery of nuclear fission, and soon thereafter, physicists realized that this reaction could be used to release immense amounts of energy. It didn’t take long for military leaders around the world to see the potential of nuclear technology as a new form of warfare.

The U.S. government, concerned that Nazi Germany might be developing nuclear weapons, initiated the Manhattan Project in 1942. Under the leadership of physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer, the project brought together some of the brightest scientific minds of the time to design the world’s first nuclear bomb. The project culminated in the Trinity test in July 1945, where the first atomic bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert. This marked a new era in warfare.

The Atomic Age Begins: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Just a few weeks after the Trinity test, the U.S. dropped two atomic bombs on Japan—one on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, and another on Nagasaki on August 9. These bombings marked the first and only use of nuclear weapons in warfare to date. The devastation caused by these bombs was unparalleled. In an instant, tens of thousands of people were killed, and many more would die later from radiation sickness, injuries, and long-term health effects.

The bombings played a significant role in Japan’s surrender and the end of World War II. However, they also sparked an intense moral and philosophical debate about the use of such destructive weapons. The world had entered the atomic age, and humanity was now faced with the realization that such power could be used to destroy entire civilizations.

The Cold War and the Arms Race

In the years following World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union entered a period of intense geopolitical rivalry known as the Cold War. Both superpowers sought to expand their influence worldwide, and this competition extended to the development of nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb in 1949, starting an arms race that would last for decades.

The Cold War era saw the development of ever-more powerful nuclear weapons. The U.S. tested the first hydrogen bomb in 1952, followed by the Soviet Union in 1953. These weapons, capable of enormous destruction, fundamentally altered the nature of warfare and international relations. Both sides developed vast arsenals of nuclear weapons, and the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) emerged, where both the U.S. and the USSR understood that any nuclear exchange would lead to the annihilation of both nations.

The Non-Proliferation Treaty and Global Efforts

As the nuclear arms race escalated, the international community grew increasingly concerned about the spread of nuclear weapons. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), signed in 1968, aimed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons while promoting peaceful uses of nuclear energy. The treaty established a framework for nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, with the goal of limiting the number of countries that could develop nuclear weapons.

While the NPT succeeded in limiting the number of nuclear-armed nations, it also created divisions, as several countries—including India, Pakistan, and Israel—pursued their own nuclear weapons programs outside the treaty framework. In the decades that followed, efforts to reduce global nuclear arsenals through arms control agreements, such as the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), sought to curb the growth of nuclear weapons.

The Impact of Nuclear Weapons

The power of nuclear weapons is staggering, but their effects extend far beyond the immediate destruction caused by a blast. The long-term consequences of a nuclear detonation are felt in various ways: environmental damage, health consequences, geopolitical ramifications, and the psychological trauma experienced by survivors.

Immediate Effects: Devastation on a Global Scale

The immediate effects of a nuclear explosion are catastrophic. The bomb detonates with a flash of intense light, followed by an explosion that sends shockwaves across the landscape. Buildings are flattened, fires ignite, and anyone within the blast radius is either vaporized or severely injured. The force of the blast can cause extreme destruction miles from the epicenter, while the thermal radiation causes third-degree burns and ignites fires across vast areas.

In addition to the blast and thermal effects, a nuclear explosion also releases intense ionizing radiation. This radiation can cause acute radiation sickness, with symptoms ranging from nausea and vomiting to organ failure and death. Radiation exposure also increases the risk of cancer and genetic mutations in the long term.

Fallout and the Aftermath

One of the most enduring dangers of nuclear weapons is the fallout, or radioactive particles that are carried by wind currents after an explosion. Fallout can contaminate large areas, poisoning water supplies, soil, and air. The effects of fallout can last for decades, causing long-term health issues, environmental degradation, and economic disruption.

The cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were bombed in 1945, remain a stark reminder of the long-term effects of nuclear warfare. Survivors, known as Hibakusha, endured physical and emotional scars that lasted for their entire lives. In addition to the immediate health consequences, they suffered from discrimination and social stigma, as the effects of radiation were often misunderstood.

Psychological Impact: A World Living in Fear

Perhaps one of the most insidious effects of nuclear weapons is their psychological impact. The constant threat of nuclear war during the Cold War created a climate of fear and anxiety that permeated everyday life. People lived under the shadow of mutually assured destruction, never knowing if a single miscalculation could lead to the end of civilization.

In the modern world, while the direct threat of nuclear war may have diminished, the psychological toll remains. The mere existence of nuclear weapons creates an atmosphere of instability, as countries continue to build and stockpile these weapons, and the fear of nuclear terrorism or accidents looms large.

The Future of Nuclear Weapons

As the world moves forward, the future of nuclear weapons remains uncertain. While the Cold War is over, the threat of nuclear proliferation has not disappeared. Several countries that do not possess nuclear weapons have expressed interest in developing them, and the risk of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of non-state actors or terrorists remains a major concern.

Efforts to reduce and eliminate nuclear weapons continue, with many advocating for a world free of nuclear weapons. However, achieving this goal will require significant diplomatic, technological, and political efforts. The challenges are immense, but the potential for a safer, more peaceful world is worth striving for.

The future of nuclear weapons is intricately linked to global security and the decisions made by world leaders. The pursuit of disarmament, non-proliferation, and responsible stewardship of nuclear technology will determine whether humanity continues to live in the shadow of the bomb or whether we move toward a world where nuclear weapons are relegated to history’s dark past.

Conclusion

Nuclear weapons are among the most powerful and destructive forces ever created by humankind. They represent the incredible potential of science and technology, but also the darker side of human ambition. From their inception in the Manhattan Project to their role in the Cold War and their continued existence today, nuclear weapons have left an indelible mark on the course of history.

The question of whether humanity can coexist with these weapons or whether we will eventually move toward a world free from nuclear arms is still unresolved. What is certain is that the story of nuclear weapons is far from over, and their impact—both physical and psychological—will continue to shape the future of our planet for generations to come.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post The History of Nuclear Weapons appeared first on Precision Background Screening.

From the US assassination of Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani to the ongoing case of the jailed mother Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, Iran has scarcely been out of the headlines in recent months. But how far back does the history of Iran stretch? Here, Professor Ali M Ansari from the University of St Andrews charts the country’s historical lineage, the emergence of Islam and Shiism, and Iran’s attempts to reconcile its traditions with the modern world.

Iran enjoys one of the richest historical lineages of any modern state stretching back several thousand years. This history can be broadly divided into three epochs: the pre-Islamic ancient period (c559 BC to 651 AD); the Islamic era (651 AD to 1800 AD); and the modern era, defined by its encounter with Western modernity from around 1800.

The pre-Islamic ancient period

‘Iranian’ history proper begins with the migration of the Iranian tribes from Central Asia onto what is now known as the Iranian plateau in the 2nd millennium BC. But organised human settlement developed much earlier and Elamite civilisation in south western Iran – southern Iraq today – emerged in the third millennium. By the 1st millennium BC, two distinct Iranian states emerged in the form of the Medes and Persians and their emphatic entrance onto the world stage began with the accession of Cyrus II in 559 BC.

The Achaemenid Persian Empire grew to become the largest contiguous land empire then known to man, impressing both friend and foe alike with its relatively benign administration drawing on religious ideas that would later be associated with Zoroastrianism, the pre-Islamic religion of Iran identified with the mantra “good words, good thoughts and good deeds”. It looms large in the Western imagination because of its failed attempts to conquer the Greek states and its subsequent defeat at the hands of Alexander the Great some 150 years later in the 330s BC. Hellenized rule under Alexander’s successors – the Seleucids – lasted a century until the arrival of a new Iranian dynasty from the east, the Parthians.

The Parthian Empire

The Parthian Empire reshaped Iranian history by importing myths and legends from the east and supplanting the Achaemenids in popular memory. This decentralised kingdom – in which the king was first among equals; a king over other kings, if you will – made up for its fractiousness with longevity (it is the longest lived of all Iranian dynasties) and proved a serious foe to the emergent Roman empire, inflicting upon it one of its greatest defeats. This was at the plains of Carrhae in 53 BC, where the Roman commander Crassus (famous for his defeat of Spartacus) was decisively defeated by a smaller Parthian force largely composed of horse archers, losing some two-thirds of his legions and several ‘eagles’ [Romans Standards]. After 500 years, in 224 AD the Parthians were in turn overthrown by another dynasty, this time from the heartlands of Persia itself, the Sasanians.

The Sasanians were undoubtedly the heirs of the Parthians but their empire was more centralised and the ‘king of kings’ was more than a first among equals. Administration was consolidated and Zoroastrianism was promoted as an official and increasingly well-defined creed. In time Sasanian kings, most notably Khusrau II, would come to symbolise all that was good about pre-Islamic Iran and its administration.

Like their predecessors, the Sasanians proved formidable opponents to the Roman and then Byzantine Empires, engaging in a cycle of conflicts which ultimately exhausted both empires and made them vulnerable to hitherto unforeseen challenges.

The Islamic era

In the 7^th century a new power emerged from the Arabian Peninsula – Islam. Defeating the Byzantines, the Muslim Arab armies eventually conquered and absorbed the Sasanian empire into the new Caliphate. The Iranian empire was too large a morsel for the Caliphate to fully digest, with the result that Iranian ideas on the nature and practice of ‘just’ government and culture began to shape the way in which the Caliphate developed.

Islam transformed the Iranian world view, but the political and religious culture of the Islamic world was in turn shaped by the profound legacy of ancient Iran and many of the leading administrative and scientific minds of the classical Islamic age including the polymath Ibn Sina (Avicenna) and the famous vizierial (ministerial) family of the Barmakids, emanated from the Iranian world.

Indeed the emphatic influence of the Iranian world was made clear with the emergence of the Abbasid Caliphate in 749 AD and the transfer of the capital from Damascus to the newly founded city of Baghdad (around 762 AD), not far from the old Sasanian capital. This Iranian turn was exemplified by the development of the ‘new’ Persian language, now empowered with the adoption of the Arabic alphabet to become the lingua franca of the eastern Islamic world, and in time one of the great literary languages of the world.

The Islamic era would witness another profound development in the history of Iran with the entrance of the Turkic peoples from central Asia from the 11th century, but most consequentially with the eruption of the Mongols (nomadic warriors from the steppes of inner Asia) in the 13th century. The Mongol conquest facilitated the migration of the Turkic tribes onto the plateau – forcing a knock-on migration of Iranians onto the Anatolian plateau – fundamentally altering the political economy of the country from one which was largely sedentary to one with a significant nomadic component, especially in the northern parts of the country.

Moreover, Mongol and Turkic words (such as ‘Khan’) feed into the Persian language adding further dimension to the vocabulary of an already rich and diverse language. In economic terms, however, the wave of nomadic invasions beginning with the Mongols and culminating in the devastation wrought by Tamerlane in the 14th century, resulted in widespread economic dislocation. It was to be many years before the economic lifeblood returned in any meaningful sense.

At the same time, taking the long view, the Mongol conquests ensured that ‘Iran’ as a distinct political entity re-emerged after centuries of seclusion within the wider Islamic world. It says something of the cultural confidence and richness of Iranian civilisation that it was able to re-form as a distinct state in its own right and by the 16th century a new dynasty was to emerge which would add further layers to this distinctiveness.

Iran had been absorbed into the Caliphate but had retained its own language and culture such that it began to influence the shape and direction of travel of the Islamic world. Even the Turkic nomads would in turn come to appreciate the cultural powerhouse that Iran and the Persian world represented, adopting and adapting many of its cultural attributes including the Persian language. With the rise of the Safavids in the 16th century this cultural confidence was given political form once again and in order to consolidate their position the Safavids imposed the minority branch of Islam, Shiism, as the new state religion from 1501.

This proved to be something of a double-edged sword. The adoption of Shiism helped distinguish the Iranian state from its Ottoman rival to the West. But it also served to hinder political ties with the Persianate world of the east. Nonetheless, over two centuries the Safavids oversaw a flourishing of Iranian civilisation, most notably under Shah Abbas I (1587–1629), the only king after the Islamic conquest to be known as ‘the Great’. Indeed, just as Iranians ascribed all pre-Islamic achievements to the reign of Khusrau I, so too was Shah Abbas credited with all and any achievements during the Islamic period.

It was during this period that the first systematic contacts were made between Iran and Europe, as European merchants came to establish commercial, and in some cases, political, ties.

Modern challenges

It is to Iran’s misfortune that the period of the most dramatic growth in European power and western civilisation in the 18th century coincided with a period of political turmoil within Iran itself. The traumatic fall of the Safavid dynasty in 1722 resulted in decades of warfare as first Iran re-emerged empowered under the leadership of Nader Shah (1736–47), only to once again descend into turmoil following his death.

As a little-known footnote in history, it was Nader Shah’s invasion and defeat of the Mughal Empire in 1739 that paradoxically opened up India to European penetration in the 18^th century. And by the time Iran emerged from its turmoil by the end of the 18^th century it faced a whole new challenge in the Russian and British empires. These were not just political threats but ideological ones with self-confident European powers who were not in awe of Iranian civilisation – on the contrary, they regarded the political economy of the Iranian state to be archaic and dependent on the authority and despotic power of its kings.

European power approached the world with new ideas about the organisation of the state, the rule of law and constitutionalism, all of which were alien to the Iranian world but which gained traction among a group of intellectuals who regarded the salvation of Iran in the adoption of these new and innovative forms of political and economic organisation. Iranians, so used to educating the world, found themselves in the reluctant position of being the student. Throughout the 19th century Iranian intellectuals and activists sought to promote reform but were faced with the objections of reactionary elements within Iran (most notably a monarchy reluctant to concede power) and with the ambivalence of imperial European powers ultimately more anxious to maintain the balance of power.

Eventually, at the turn of the 20^th century, in 1906, the first of Iran’s revolutions – the Constitutional Revolution – established a parliamentary system on the British model, complete with a constitution and separation of powers. It was a seminal moment that altered the political landscape of the country. But its ambitions were high and its promise remained unfulfilled as a new dynasty – the Pahlavis (1925–79) – sought to impose revolution from above.

With the emergence of the Pahlavis in 1925 the revolutionary impetus of 1906 was adopted with some vigour by the new monarch supported initially by many of the intellectuals of the period who were anxious to see the creation of a modern state that would enable their many reforms to education and the judicial system to be realised. Reza Shah’s rule oversaw a transformation of the country but the reforms he oversaw were only partially fulfilled, with the growth in the power of the state not being matched by a growth in civil society and civic rights.

Overthrown following an Allied occupation (1941–46) in the turmoil of the Second World War, he was succeeded by his young son Mohammad Reza Shah (1941–79) who for the first period of his reign had to contend with growing factionalism as well as the continued interference of foreign powers. The crisis over the continued Soviet occupation of Azerbaijan was resolved in 1946, but a more serious crisis over Iran’s oil industry resulted in an Anglo-American orchestrated coup to overthrow the nationalist prime minister Dr Mohammad Mosaddeq who had encouraged the Shah to reign rather than rule. As with the revolution of 1906, the coup of 1953 was to cast a long shadow over Iranian politics and the Shah struggled to emerge from it.

Royal autocracy and the ‘Islamic’ revolution

In the 1960s the Shah felt strong enough to launch a ‘White’ revolution of his own, further transforming the socio-economic landscape of the country but failing to match these dramatic changes with a measure of political reform. Indeed, far from democratising, the 1970s witnessed a retrenchment of royal autocracy. Political stagnation with social and economic change proved to be a combustible combination to which was added a religious revival centred on the figure of Ayatollah Khomeini. By 1978 the Shah, faced with opposition from nationalists, the left and the religious groups, found himself no longer master of his political domain, increasingly at a loss as to how to react to the groundswell of discontent.

He went into exile in January 1979. Two weeks later Ayatollah Khomeini returned to the adulation of the crowds (pictured above) and in short order the monarchy was replaced by an Islamic Republic. But this new ‘Islamic’ revolution proved no more successful in reconciling Iran’s traditions with the challenges of modernity. The seizure of the US Embassy in November 1979 and the start of a protracted war with Iraq in 1980, which lasted to 1988, both scarred and defined the emergent Islamic Republic. Rampant factionalism was not expunged by the violent suppression of the Left, and the Islamic Republic has been characterised by fierce debates over the nature and character of the state dividing between those who favour the republican institutions and those who seek the establishment of an Islamic government.

The dominance of the ‘Islamists’ and the growing autocracy of the ‘supreme leader’ indicate that the problems of 1906 remain unresolved and that 1979 simply witnessed the ‘crown’ being replaced by the ‘turban’.

If you found this information useful, please check out our blog for more articles like this.

If you need to run background checks and would like a free quote click here and let us know how we can help you.

The post Iran: A Brief History appeared first on Precision Background Screening.